for accounting Item 4.02 & 4.01 screeningXBRL fundamentals to ~2009Cited to the filing

The filings tell you first

Non-reliance 8-Ks, auditor changes, impairments, and XBRL fundamentals — screened in plain English and cited to the filing, for audit, advisory, and forensic work.

Before / after

How the work changes

The same jobs, without the exports, the tabs, or the unverifiable answer.

Today

Restatement risk surfaced when the news wrote about it.

With Kaleidoscope

Screen for Item 4.02 non-reliance and Item 4.01 auditor changes the day they are filed.

Today

Comparables meant pulling XBRL by hand or paying for another terminal seat.

With Kaleidoscope

Quarterly fundamentals for ~4,400 filers back to ~2009 — growth, margins, capex, leases — in one question.

Today

Finding the language meant reading the whole filing.

With Kaleidoscope

Pull the exact sentences behind a signal — impairment, going concern, control weakness — each cited.

The prompt pack

Ask in plain English

Run these today in Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP client — each returns a cited answer.

You ask

Which companies filed non-reliance 8-Ks (Item 4.02) last quarter?

You ask

Show auditor changes in the software sector this year.

You ask

Pull NVDA's last 8 quarters of revenue, margins, and capex intensity.

You ask

Find going-concern language in recent 10-Ks for this peer set.

Browse the full prompt library →

Your families

What this desk licenses

filings

News, Research & Filings

Filings tagged by 529 classifiers, extracted news events, filing search by meaning, IPO prospectuses.

The News, Research & Filings family →

fundamentals

Fundamentals

XBRL quarters with de-cumulated TTM, executive pay — comps, dilution and capital structure landing.

The Fundamentals family →

overview

Overviews

The company at a glance: snapshot, reference data, event calendar, people & board, and the filing itself.

The Overviews family →

Straight answers

The questions this desk asks first

Can we use this in audit and advisory workflows?

The data is derived from public SEC filings and every figure cites its source, so anything you take forward is independently verifiable at the filing.

Is any client data involved?

No. Nothing you hold is uploaded or ingested, and your queries are not used to train models.

How current are the filings?

Filings flow through the pipeline as the SEC publishes them; news refreshes daily.

How reliable are the XBRL fundamentals?

Values come from company-filed XBRL, quarterly back to ~2009, with sector-specific fields surfaced only when the company actually reported them — nothing imputed.

Public-filing data only — no client data ingested, no training on queries, read-only tools. How we handle data →