Change-of-control provisions, indemnification language, covenants, and disclosure precedents — searched by concept and cited to the filing, not summarized from memory.
One protocol — bring it to the assistant you already use
The same jobs, without the exports, the tabs, or the unverifiable answer.
Before
Precedent research meant full-text EDGAR searches and reading exhibits one by one.
With MCP
Search material contracts by concept and land on the exact clause, cited to the 8-K or exhibit it was filed with.
Before
Comparing terms across a deal set meant a junior associate and a weekend.
With MCP
Line up indemnification, covenant, or change-of-control language across a peer set in minutes.
Before
Disclosure and governance checks meant manual filing review.
With MCP
Screen for auditor changes, non-reliance, and governance language — each hit traced to its source filing.
Run these today in Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP client — each returns a cited answer.
Find change-of-control provisions across these merger agreements.
Compare indemnification clauses for these three deals.
Which credit agreements include this covenant?
Show 8-Ks disclosing auditor changes in this sector this year.
Connect any subset — each is a focused, cited surface for its own domain.
No. Nothing of yours is uploaded or ingested. Every server reads only from our own corpora, built from public SEC filings and exhibits.
Queries and results are not used to train models — ours or anyone else's — and tools are read-only with no side effects.
Public filings: the 8-Ks, proxies, and exhibits that material agreements were filed with. Each clause carries the filing it came from.
Every answer cites its source filing, so verification is one click — you check the exhibit itself, not our summary of it.
No client documents ingested, queries never used for training, read-only by design. How we handle data
Request a demo and we'll walk through the workflow above with your names, your dates, and your questions.
Request a Demo