for law firms Clause-level citationsNo client documents ingestedRead-only by design

Precedent language, cited to the exhibit

Change-of-control provisions, indemnification language, covenants, and disclosure precedents — searched by concept and cited to the filing, not summarized from memory.

Before / after

How the work changes

The same jobs, without the exports, the tabs, or the unverifiable answer.

Today

Precedent research meant full-text EDGAR searches and reading exhibits one by one.

With Kaleidoscope

Search material contracts by concept and land on the exact clause, cited to the 8-K or exhibit it was filed with.

Today

Comparing terms across a deal set meant a junior associate and a weekend.

With Kaleidoscope

Line up indemnification, covenant, or change-of-control language across a peer set in minutes.

Today

Disclosure and governance checks meant manual filing review.

With Kaleidoscope

Screen for auditor changes, non-reliance, and governance language — each hit traced to its source filing.

The prompt pack

Ask in plain English

Run these today in Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP client — each returns a cited answer.

You ask

Find change-of-control provisions across these merger agreements.

You ask

Compare indemnification clauses for these three deals.

You ask

Which credit agreements include this covenant?

You ask

Show 8-Ks disclosing auditor changes in this sector this year.

Browse the full prompt library →

Your families

What this desk licenses

filings

News, Research & Filings

Filings tagged by 529 classifiers, extracted news events, filing search by meaning, IPO prospectuses.

The News, Research & Filings family →

transactions

M&A

Deal history, comparable transactions, trending acquirers, and the trail behind each deal.

The M&A family →

activism

Activism

Campaigns and >5% stakes with stated intent, accumulation trails, and proxy votes.

The Activism family →

people

People

Person-first research: profiles, boards and affiliations, transactions, vesting calendars.

The People family →

Straight answers

The questions this desk asks first

Do you see or store our client documents?

No. Nothing of yours is uploaded or ingested. Every server reads only from our own corpora, built from public SEC filings and exhibits.

Are our queries confidential?

Queries and results are not used to train models — ours or anyone else's — and tools are read-only with no side effects.

Where does the agreement data come from?

Public filings: the 8-Ks, proxies, and exhibits that material agreements were filed with. Each clause carries the filing it came from.

Can we rely on what it returns?

Every answer cites its source filing, so verification is one click — you check the exhibit itself, not our summary of it.

No client documents ingested, queries never used for training, read-only by design. How we handle data →